tiny-pattern-ts/CONTRIBUTING.md

# Contributing

This document is for maintainers and contributors working on the project
itself. End-user documentation is in [README.md](./README.md). The reasons
behind the rules here — the decisions, rejected alternatives, and known issues —
live in [development/](./development/README.md). The machine entry point for AI
coding agents is [AGENTS.md](./AGENTS.md); keep this file as the prose home for
the rules so agents and humans don't diverge.

## Setup

1. Clone the repository.
2. Install Node.js >= 26 — see [.node-version](./.node-version); the exact pinned
   version is what CI and the runner image use.
3. `npm ci`.
4. `npm run setup` — the one-time clone configuration (currently registers the
   commit-message template).

## Development commands

- **Build:** `npm run build`
- **Test:** `npm run test`, `npm run test:ci`
- **Watch:** `npm run watch` - re-runs tests on file save, humans only
- **Checks:** `npm run check`, `npm run fix`
- **Verify:** `npm run verify` — the definition of done
- **Maintenance:** `npm run maintain` — advisory only
- **Individual fixes:** `npm run fix:oxfmt`, `npm run fix:oxlint`

## Feedback tiers

The tools are organized into a feedback ladder. Each tier catches different
things at different costs; the rule of thumb is "earlier tiers fire more often,
faster tiers catch less, slower tiers are more thorough":

| Tier                             | When                    | What it runs                                                                                                                                            | Time  |
| -------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- |
| `npm run watch`                  | manual                  | `watch:test` — re-runs tests on file save                                                                                                               | ~0.1s |
| Pre-commit (auto)                | on stage                | tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (staged files only)                                                                                                       | ~1.3s |
| Pre-push (auto)                  | on push                 | `npm test` (full tsc + unit tests)                                                                                                                      | ~3.5s |
| `npm run check`                  | manual                  | Correctness gates: tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (whole project)                                                                                        | ~3s   |
| `npm run verify`                 | manual                  | Definition of done: `npm run check` + unit tests, one shot                                                                                              | ~6s   |
| `npm run fix`                    | manual                  | Auto-resolve fixable issues (lint, format)                                                                                                              | ~3s   |
| `npm run maintain`               | manual / CI (advisory)  | `maintain:knip` + `maintain:outdated` (whole-project + network scans)                                                                                   | ~10s  |
| CI build (auto)                  | on push to `main` / tag | `build` job (build + correctness + packaging) — see [.gitea/workflows/ci.yml](./.gitea/workflows/ci.yml)                                                | ~30s+ |
| CI maintain (auto, non-blocking) | on push to `main`       | `npm run maintain` — reports, never fails the build                                                                                                     | ~10s  |
| CI publish (auto)                | on tag                  | packaging checks + `publish:publint` / `publish:attw`, then the Gitea release page and `npm publish` (skipped, and the job failed, without `NPM_TOKEN`) | ~15s  |

Before pushing, run `npm run verify` — the one-shot correctness gate. Run
`npm run maintain` only on a maintenance / update-deps branch. Why the splits
are where they are: [development/workflow.md § Feedback tiers](./development/workflow.md#feedback-tiers).

## Testing discipline (type-driven)

For this library the types _are_ the feature, so development is **type-driven**:
the compile-time expectation is written before the runtime assertion, and both
before the implementation. The loop is **type → red → green → refactor**:

1. **Type** — write the compile-time expectation first
   (`expectTypeOf(...).toEqualTypeOf<…>()`) and let `npm run check:tsc` fail on
   the _type_. The type error is the spec you want to hit before the runtime
   logic exists.
2. **Red** — add the matching runtime assertion (`assert.*`) so
   `npm run test:unit` now fails on behavior.
3. **Green** — implement in `src/*.ts` until both the type check and the test
   pass.
4. **Refactor** — with the type system and the tests as the safety net, then
   `npm run verify` as the definition-of-done gate.

Every test pairs an `expectTypeOf(...)` with an `assert.*`; keep them together.
Each test body follows **AAA (Arrange–Act–Assert)** with labeled blocks
separated by a blank line: `// Arrange` sets up the inputs (e.g. the matcher
factory), `// Act` exercises the subject once from them (not a second
throwaway call), `// Assert` holds every check — type expectations first,
runtime assertions last; an empty block drops its label (see
[development/testing.md § AAA ordering](./development/testing.md#aaa-ordering)).
Type-first is enforced structurally: `npm test` runs `check:tsc` before the
test runner, so a wrong type can never be papered over by a passing assertion.
Per [AGENTS.md § Never do](./AGENTS.md#never-do), reach green honestly — fix the
types, never suppress the checks you can't make pass. Full rationale:
[development/testing.md](./development/testing.md).

## Code style and formatting

`oxfmt` is the formatter and `oxlint` is the linter (with type-aware rules).
`npm run fix` resolves the fixable issues; `npm run check` verifies without
writing. Suppressions must be fixed at the root — do not add `oxlint-disable`
directives or `as` casts to force a green run (see
[AGENTS.md § Never do](./AGENTS.md#never-do)).

Suggested VSCode extensions are in
[.vscode/extensions.json](./.vscode/extensions.json); the project's formatter
and linter are wired up there. Toolchain decisions:
[development/tooling.md](./development/tooling.md).

## Commit messages

Gitmoji subject, imperative mood, 50/72 wrapping. The template is
[commit-message-template](./commit-message-template); `npm run setup`
(or `npm run setup:git-commit-message`) registers it as git's
`commit.template`. Examples and rationale:
[development/workflow.md § Commit messages](./development/workflow.md#commit-messages).

## Script prefix convention

Script names in `package.json` use a prefix that signals _when_ the script is
intended to run. A `<prefix>:<name>` script is implicitly aggregated by a
`<prefix>` script (if one exists) and run by the corresponding lefthook hook or
CI step. Pick the prefix that matches the script's lifecycle:

- `create:*` — front doors of the repo's own workflow; these mutate git state
  rather than the source. `create:branch` opens a unit of work, `create:finish`
  closes the branch half, `create:release` closes the release half
  (maintainer-only). No bare `create` aggregator on purpose.
- `check:*` — read-only verification; never modifies files. Aggregated by
  `npm run check`.
- `fix:*` — mutating counterpart of a `check:*` script. Aggregated by
  `npm run fix`; the diff is the review surface.
- `test:*` — test scripts. `test` is the canonical entry point (`check:tsc` +
  unit tests); `test:unit` skips the typecheck for fast local iteration;
  `test:ci` adds c8 coverage.
- `watch:*` — long-running watchers for the manual inner dev loop. Aggregated by
  `watch`.
- `maintain:*` — advisory repo-maintenance scans: read-only, but whole-project
  and/or network-bound, so never a correctness gate. Aggregated by
  `npm run maintain`.
- `publish:*` — validates the _publishable artifact_ (e.g. `dist/`) rather than
  the source, so it needs a fresh build.
- `setup:*` — one-time configuration of a fresh clone; mutates the local
  environment rather than the repo source, so it is never part of a hook or CI
  step. Aggregated by `npm run setup`, run once after cloning.

A new script must reuse an existing prefix. If none fits, that's a signal the
script doesn't belong in the pipeline — not a reason to invent a new prefix. If
it genuinely does belong, add the prefix to this list in the same commit as its
first member; an undocumented prefix becomes invisible and quietly accrues
members. Why `create:` exists, the rejected names, and the design of the bare
scripts: [development/workflow.md § Script prefix convention](./development/workflow.md#script-prefix-convention).

## Rules the tools don't enforce

CI and review will bounce these even though `npm run check` and the linters
don't catch them. They're the high-frequency things a contributor (or an agent)
reaches for by default:

- **Source imports use `.ts` extensions, never `.js`.** `node --strip-types`
  only resolves the `.ts` form at test time; "pre-fixing" an import to `.js`
  breaks the inner loop. (why:
  [development/tooling.md](./development/tooling.md#source-imports-use-ts-extensions))
- **A new `npm run` script must reuse an existing prefix.** See
  [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention).
- **`oxlint-disable` directives live in source, not `.oxlintrc.json`.** The
  trade-off must sit next to the code it silences. This is a _human_ last-resort
  convention; agents must not add these — see
  [AGENTS.md § Never do](./AGENTS.md#never-do). (why:
  [development/tooling.md](./development/tooling.md#oxlint-disable-directives-live-next-to-the-code))
- **Don't put slow / network / whole-project scans in `check` or pre-commit.**
  Advisory scans are not correctness gates; they belong under `maintain:`. (why:
  [development/workflow.md](./development/workflow.md#feedback-tiers))
- **New work starts with `npm run create:branch`, never a hand-written
  `git switch -c` / `git checkout -b`.** The command carries the branch
  precondition; branching around it skips the clean-tree, current-`main` and
  green-baseline checks, and the skip is invisible until a failure can no longer
  be attributed. (why:
  [development/workflow.md](./development/workflow.md#branching-model))
- **Work is merged back with `npm run create:finish`, never a hand-written
  `git merge`.** The command carries the merge-side preconditions (clean tree,
  current `main`, a `feature/`/`fix/`/`chore/` branch) and runs `npm run verify`
  after the merge, so a merge cannot land unverified. (why:
  [development/workflow.md](./development/workflow.md#branching-model))
- **There is no local `npm run publish`, and `publish:publint` / `publish:attw`
  don't go in `check`.** (why:
  [development/publishing.md](./development/publishing.md#ci-only-publishing))
- **A branch ends with a changelog note:** before `npm run create:finish`,
  summarize the work under `[Unreleased]` in [CHANGELOG.md](./CHANGELOG.md).
  (why:
  [development/workflow.md](./development/workflow.md#changelog-notes))
- **A decision or its rationale belongs in `development/`, not here.** This file
  holds the actionable rule; `development/<category>.md` holds why, the rejected
  alternatives and the known issues. When you change a rule, update its category
  file in the same commit and cross-link the two. (why:
  [development/README.md](./development/README.md))
- **Prose in `development/` is extremely concise.** When adding or changing a
  decision, write fragments if needed — sacrifice grammar for concision. (why:
  [development/README.md § Decision blocks](./development/README.md#decision-blocks))

## Branching model

**GitHub Flow (single-developer).** Every change — feature, fix, refactor —
branches off `main` and is merged back via a local commit. There is no pull
request workflow on Gitea yet.

- **Base branch:** `main`
- **Branch naming:** `feature/<desc>` / `fix/<desc>` / `chore/<desc>`
- **Starting work:** `npm run create:branch -- <prefix>/<desc>`. It refuses,
  without changing anything, unless the working tree is clean, no
  merge/rebase/cherry-pick is in progress, `main` is not behind its upstream
  (a local merge not yet pushed is fine — the push belongs to `create:release`),
  and `npm run test` is green on `main`. The prefix is _your_ call, inferred from
  the task; the script validates it rather than guessing it.
- **Merging:** `npm run create:finish` (on the branch). It re-asserts the same
  preconditions, merges `--no-ff`, runs `npm run verify`, and deletes the branch
  only after the merge is green. The push is left to `create:release`, so the
  merge stays local and reviewable.
- CI runs on every push to `main` — see [Feedback tiers](#feedback-tiers) and
  [.gitea/workflows/ci.yml](./.gitea/workflows/ci.yml).
- **Releases are NOT triggered by pushes.** Only the maintainer triggers a
  release; see [Publishing](#publishing).

Full rationale, including the front-door decisions:
[development/workflow.md § Branching model](./development/workflow.md#branching-model).

## Submitting changes

There is no pull request workflow on Gitea yet, so a contribution is submitted
as a branch that is merged locally:

1. `npm run create:branch -- <prefix>/<desc>`.
2. Commit your work (one or more commits, per the tests and style rules above).
3. `npm run verify` — the definition of done.
4. Add a changelog note under `[Unreleased]` (see
   [Rules the tools don't enforce](#rules-the-tools-dont-enforce)).
5. `npm run create:finish` to merge the branch into `main` and verify the
   result.
6. Present a handover for review. Once there are no further objections, the
   maintainer pushes.

When the project is promoted to GitHub, this step becomes a normal pull request
against `main`.

## Publishing

Publishing is maintainer-only and CI-only. See
[development/publishing.md](./development/publishing.md).