Files
tiny-pattern-ts/CONTRIBUTING.md
T
tmu 892aead383 🐛 Fix commit template setup with git config
Copying the template into .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG has no lasting
effect: git pre-fills that file from the commit.template config,
so the script registered nothing and the template never appeared.
Use git's own mechanism, which is what git reads for every
interactive commit.

Name, prefix and call site are unchanged, so README's setup
bullet stays correct; only the sentence describing the old copy
in CONTRIBUTING needed rewording. Note the config holds a path
relative to the working directory, so it applies to commits made
from the repo root.
2026-09-06 00:26:22 +02:00

81 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Contributing
This document is for maintainers and contributors working on the project itself. End-user documentation is in [README.md](./README.md). The machine entry point for AI coding agents is [AGENTS.md](./AGENTS.md); keep this file as the prose home for the rules below so agents and humans don't diverge.
## Rules the tools don't enforce
CI and review will bounce these even though `npm run check` and the linters don't catch them. They're the high-frequency things a contributor (or an agent) reaches for by default:
- **Source imports use `.ts` extensions, never `.js`.** `node --strip-types` resolves the `.ts` form at test time; `rewriteRelativeImportExtensions` emits `.js` in `dist/`. "Pre-fixing" an import to `.js` breaks the inner loop. (rationale: README § Tooling decisions)
- **A new `npm run` script must reuse an existing prefix** (`check:` / `fix:` / `test:` / `watch:` / `maintain:` / `publish:`). If none fits, that's a signal the script doesn't belong in the pipeline — not a reason to invent a new prefix. (see [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention))
- **`oxlint-disable` directives live in source, not `.oxlintrc.json`.** The trade-off must sit next to the code it silences. This is a _human_ last-resort convention; agents must not add these — see [AGENTS.md § Never do](./AGENTS.md#never-do). (rationale: README § Tooling decisions)
- **Don't put slow / network / whole-project scans in `check` or pre-commit.** `maintain:knip` (~4s, whole project) and `maintain:outdated` (~6.5s, registry) are advisory, not correctness — they live under the `maintain:` prefix and run in CI as a **non-blocking** job, never gating a merge. (see [Why these splits](#why-these-splits) and [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention))
- **There is no local `npm run publish`, and `publish:publint` / `publish:attw` don't go in `check`.** They validate the publishable artifact (`dist/`) and run only in the CI `publish` job. (see [Publishing workflow](#publishing-workflow))
## Commit messages
Gitmoji subject, imperative mood, 50/72 wrapping. The template is `commit-message-template`; run `npm run use:git-commit-message` once after cloning to register it as git's `commit.template`.
Examples from history: `:sparkles: Add watch tier with watch:test child`, `:recycle: Move type-aware config to .oxlintrc.json; use source-level disable directives`, `:memo: Restore unique maintainer content as CONTRIBUTING.md`. The body explains _what and why_, not _how_; link issues with `Resolves #...`.
## Script prefix convention
Script names in `package.json` use a prefix that signals _when_ the script is intended to run. A `<prefix>:<name>` script is implicitly aggregated by a `<prefix>` script (if one exists) and run by the corresponding lefthook hook or CI step. Picking the right prefix documents the script's intended lifecycle:
- `check:*` — read-only verification. Aggregated by `npm run check`. Used in pre-commit hooks (on staged files) and CI's build job (on the whole project). Read-only; never modifies files.
- `fix:*` — mutating counterpart of a `check:*` script. Aggregated by `npm run fix`. Use after `npm run check` to auto-resolve issues; the diff is the review surface.
- `test:*` — test scripts. `npm run test` is the canonical entry point (`check:tsc` + unit tests); `test:unit` skips the typecheck for fast local iteration; `test:ci` adds c8 coverage and is the CI variant.
- `watch:*` — long-running watchers, started manually via `npm run watch` for the inner dev loop. Sits "before" pre-commit in the feedback ladder (see Feedback tiers below). Currently a single child (`watch:test`); future `watch:oxlint` / `watch:tsc` would aggregate under the same `watch` umbrella.
- `maintain:*` — advisory repo-maintenance scans (dead code, dependency freshness): read-only, but whole-project and/or network-bound, so they are **not** correctness gates. Aggregated by `npm run maintain`. Run on an explicit maintenance / update-deps branch, and in CI as a non-blocking job (continue-on-error) that surfaces findings without ever failing a feature PR.
- `publish:*` — runs only at publish time, in the CI `publish` job (immediately before `npm publish`). There is **no** local `npm run publish` script — publishing is CI-only by policy. The `publish:` prefix still documents intent: this script validates the _publishable artifact_ (e.g., `dist/`) rather than the source.
A new script should pick the prefix that matches its lifecycle, not invent a new one. If no existing prefix fits, that's a signal the script doesn't belong in the standard pipeline.
Separately, some top-level scripts are **bare** (no prefix): the entry points that either run a single tool (`build`, `clean`) or aggregate a `prefix:*` family (`check`, `fix`, `test`, `watch`, `maintain`), plus `verify`, a cross-cutting convenience that composes `check` + `test:unit` into one whole-project correctness gate. Bare commands are how you invoke a tier; the `prefix:*` scripts are what those tiers are made of.
## Feedback tiers
The tools are organized into a feedback ladder. Each tier catches different things at different costs; the rule of thumb is "earlier tiers fire more often, faster tiers catch less, slower tiers are more thorough":
| Tier | When | What it runs | Time |
| -------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- |
| `npm run watch` | manual | `watch:test` — re-runs tests on file save | ~0.1s |
| Pre-commit (auto) | on stage | tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (staged files only) | ~1.3s |
| Pre-push (auto) | on push | `npm test` (full tsc + unit tests) | ~3.5s |
| `npm run check` | manual | Correctness gates: tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (whole project) | ~3s |
| `npm run verify` | manual | Definition of done: `npm run check` + unit tests, one shot | ~6s |
| `npm run fix` | manual | Auto-resolve fixable issues (lint, format) | ~3s |
| `npm run maintain` | manual / CI (advisory) | `maintain:knip` + `maintain:outdated` (whole-project + network scans) | ~10s |
| CI build (auto) | on push/PR | `npm run check` + `npm run test:ci` | ~30s+ |
| CI maintain (auto, non-blocking) | on push/PR | `npm run maintain` — reports, never fails the build | ~10s |
| CI publish (auto) | on tag | `publish:publint` + `publish:attw`, then `npm publish` | ~10s |
### Why these splits?
- **`watch:*` is a manual tier, not a hook.** The developer starts it on demand (it has to be killed with Ctrl-C) and it runs in a dedicated terminal pane. It sits as the earliest tier in the feedback ladder, catching failures the moment a file is saved — before staging, before commit. The umbrella `watch` script is designed to aggregate multiple `watch:*` children (currently just `watch:test`); if more watchers are added later (e.g. `watch:oxlint`), the umbrella would switch to running them concurrently rather than sequentially.
- **`check:tsc`, `check:oxlint`, `check:oxfmt`, `check:cspell`** are in pre-commit because they are fast (~0.2–0.5s each), fully offline, and naturally scope to staged files via the `LEFTHOOK_FILES` env var convention. They give instant feedback on what you typed.
- **`test` (and the `tsc` it includes) is in pre-push** because it runs the whole test suite across the whole project. The pre-commit `LEFTHOOK_FILES` convention doesn't apply to the test runner, so pre-commit isn't the right home. Pre-push runs after all commits are made but before the push leaves the machine, catching regressions that span multiple commits.
- **`maintain:knip` and `maintain:outdated` are advisory, not correctness** — knip scans the whole project (~4s) and `check-outdated` queries the npm registry (~6.5s, network-dependent, and it exits non-zero whenever any dep is behind). That's why they live under `maintain:`, are excluded from pre-commit and from `check`, and run in CI as a **non-blocking** job: a stale dependency must never block an unrelated feature PR.
- **`publish:publint` and `publish:attw` are NOT in `check`** — they belong to the `publish:` prefix because they validate the _publishable artifact_ (`dist/`) and require a fresh build. Running them on every commit would be wasteful. They run in the CI `publish` job immediately before `npm publish`.
- **`verify` is a convenience umbrella, not a new tier.** `npm run verify` = `npm run check` + `npm run test:unit`, so a human or agent gets the whole-project correctness answer in one command. It uses `test:unit` (not `test`) because `check` already runs `tsc`, so the type checker runs exactly once. It excludes `maintain` by design, and CI still runs `check` + `test:ci` separately (to also collect coverage), so `verify` is a local/dev affordance.
### Before pushing
Run `npm run verify` locally — it is the one-shot whole-project correctness gate (`check` + unit tests). Anything `maintain:knip` or `maintain:outdated` would catch is reported by the non-blocking CI `maintain` job; run `npm run maintain` yourself only on a maintenance / update-deps branch.
## Publishing workflow
Publishing is CI-only by policy. Local `npm publish` is not supported.
1. Develop and merge PRs to `main`.
2. CI runs `npm run check` + `npm run test:ci` on every push and PR — this is the authoritative gate.
3. After all intended changes are on `main`, bump the version locally:
```sh
npm version <patch|minor|major>
```
4. Push the tag to GitHub:
```sh
git push --follow-tags origin main
```
5. The `publish` CI job runs on the tag: `build` → `publish:publint` → `publish:attw` → `npm publish --access public`. The publish-tier checks must pass before the artifact is published.