Files
tiny-pattern-ts/development/README.md
T
tmu c15bc0153e 📝 Require concise prose in development/
Actionable sentence in CONTRIBUTING.md § Rules the tools don't enforce;
the why — humans skim, agents imitate the dominant style, so verbosity
compounds — in development/README.md § Decision blocks. Both sides in
one commit per the write-each-fact-once rule.
2026-09-16 08:00:36 +00:00

82 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown

# Development documentation
Why this project works the way it does: the decisions, what was rejected, and
the shortcomings and known issues we carry. Written for maintainers and
contributors.
The actionable rules — setup, running, testing, submitting — live in
[CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md). **Each fact is written once**: the rule
there, the reason here; neither restates the other, and where a fact is useful
in both they link. Read the relevant file before changing an area, and when a
rule changes update its rationale here in the same commit.
User-facing documentation is [README.md](../README.md). `docs/` is deliberately
unused: that name is reserved for the future user documentation site, and
deploying it is out of scope. These files are not part of that site.
## Layout
One file per category:
| File | Covers |
| -------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| [library.md](./library.md) | Public API design, the type-level contract, and its limitations |
| [workflow.md](./workflow.md) | Branching and merging, script prefixes, feedback tiers, commit messages |
| [tooling.md](./tooling.md) | Toolchain choices and configuration, editor setup |
| [testing.md](./testing.md) | Test strategy and type-driven development |
| [ci.md](./ci.md) | CI pipeline, runner image, coverage serving |
| [publishing.md](./publishing.md) | Release and npm publishing |
We start with one file per category so each area stays small enough to hold in
mind; a category that outgrows it becomes a folder with an index, and the links
in CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md point at the category, not a single decision.
## Decision blocks
Record every non-obvious choice as a block in the relevant category file:
```md
## Runner image
#### Decision (2026-09)
Bake Node into the CI job image at the setup-node tool-cache layout instead
of downloading per job.
#### Why
- ...
#### Rejected
- Gitea Pages / per-job download
- force-pull
#### Known issue
- a Dockerfile-only change re-pushed under an unchanged tag is invisible to the runner
- recover with `docker rmi <image>`
```
- The date is the month the decision was made, not when the file was edited —
the anchor for "current" versus "was current once".
- `Rejected` stops the project re-litigating the same alternatives; an empty one
usually means they were never written down.
- `Known issue` is where shortcomings live. A caveat not tied to one decision
goes under a `## Known issues` section at the end of the file.
- Replace a superseded decision in place rather than archiving it; git history
is the archive.
- Terse is the point: humans skim and agents imitate the style already in the
file, so verbosity compounds edit over edit. Grammar loses to density here on
purpose.
## Adding to these docs
1. Pick the category: `library`, `workflow`, `tooling`, `testing`, `ci`,
`publishing`.
2. Add or update a decision block; keep existing text unless the decision
changed.
3. If an actionable rule changes, update
[CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md) in the same commit and cross-link.
Never change a rule there without updating its rationale here.