📝 Move knip + outdated to a maintain: prefix

`npm run check` should be the fast, offline correctness ladder only (tsc +
oxlint + oxfmt + cspell, ~3s), so an agent can run it as a confirmation gate
during feature work. check:knip / check:outdated were advisory whole-project /
network scans, and check-outdated exits non-zero whenever any dep is behind.
Keeping them in check made `npm run check` (and the CI build gate) fail on
dependency freshness, which must not block an unrelated feature PR.

Rename them to maintain:knip / maintain:outdated, aggregate under `npm run
maintain`, and run it in CI as a dedicated non-blocking job (continue-on-error)
that surfaces findings without ever gating a merge. Update the script-prefix
convention, the feedback-tier table, and AGENTS.md: the agent may now run
`npm run check`; only `maintain` stays out of the feature loop.
This commit is contained in:
tmu committed 2026-09-05 16:47:55 +02:00
1 parent 8940537fc0
commit 7973bf0d0b
5 files changed
+44 -19

No files matched your search

+16 -13
View File
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ This document is for maintainers and contributors working on the project itself.
CI and review will bounce these even though `npm run check` and the linters don't catch them. They're the high-frequency things a contributor (or an agent) reaches for by default:
- **Source imports use `.ts` extensions, never `.js`.** `node --strip-types` resolves the `.ts` form at test time; `rewriteRelativeImportExtensions` emits `.js` in `dist/`. "Pre-fixing" an import to `.js` breaks the inner loop. (rationale: README § Tooling decisions)
- **A new `npm run` script must reuse an existing prefix** (`check:` / `fix:` / `test:` / `watch:` / `publish:`). If none fits, that's a signal the script doesn't belong in the pipeline — not a reason to invent a new prefix. (see [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention))
- **A new `npm run` script must reuse an existing prefix** (`check:` / `fix:` / `test:` / `watch:` / `maintain:` / `publish:`). If none fits, that's a signal the script doesn't belong in the pipeline — not a reason to invent a new prefix. (see [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention))
- **`oxlint-disable` directives live in source, not `.oxlintrc.json`.** The trade-off must sit next to the code it silences. This is a _human_ last-resort convention; agents must not add these — see [AGENTS.md § Never do](./AGENTS.md#never-do). (rationale: README § Tooling decisions)
- **Don't put slow / network / whole-project checks in pre-commit.** `check:knip` (~4s) and `check:outdated` (~6.5s, network) are deliberately excluded from the hook to keep it fast and offline. (see [Why these splits](#why-these-splits))
- **Don't put slow / network / whole-project scans in `check` or pre-commit.** `maintain:knip` (~4s, whole project) and `maintain:outdated` (~6.5s, registry) are advisory, not correctness — they live under the `maintain:` prefix and run in CI as a **non-blocking** job, never gating a merge. (see [Why these splits](#why-these-splits) and [Script prefix convention](#script-prefix-convention))
- **There is no local `npm run publish`, and `publish:publint` / `publish:attw` don't go in `check`.** They validate the publishable artifact (`dist/`) and run only in the CI `publish` job. (see [Publishing workflow](#publishing-workflow))
## Commit messages
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Script names in `package.json` use a prefix that signals _when_ the script is in
- `fix:*` — mutating counterpart of a `check:*` script. Aggregated by `npm run fix`. Use after `npm run check` to auto-resolve issues; the diff is the review surface.
- `test:*` — test scripts. `npm run test` is the canonical entry point (`check:tsc` + unit tests); `test:unit` skips the typecheck for fast local iteration; `test:ci` adds c8 coverage and is the CI variant.
- `watch:*` — long-running watchers, started manually via `npm run watch` for the inner dev loop. Sits "before" pre-commit in the feedback ladder (see Feedback tiers below). Currently a single child (`watch:test`); future `watch:oxlint` / `watch:tsc` would aggregate under the same `watch` umbrella.
- `maintain:*` — advisory repo-maintenance scans (dead code, dependency freshness): read-only, but whole-project and/or network-bound, so they are **not** correctness gates. Aggregated by `npm run maintain`. Run on an explicit maintenance / update-deps branch, and in CI as a non-blocking job (continue-on-error) that surfaces findings without ever failing a feature PR.
- `publish:*` — runs only at publish time, in the CI `publish` job (immediately before `npm publish`). There is **no** local `npm run publish` script — publishing is CI-only by policy. The `publish:` prefix still documents intent: this script validates the _publishable artifact_ (e.g., `dist/`) rather than the source.
A new script should pick the prefix that matches its lifecycle, not invent a new one. If no existing prefix fits, that's a signal the script doesn't belong in the standard pipeline.
@@ -34,27 +35,29 @@ A new script should pick the prefix that matches its lifecycle, not invent a new
The tools are organized into a feedback ladder. Each tier catches different things at different costs; the rule of thumb is "earlier tiers fire more often, faster tiers catch less, slower tiers are more thorough":
| Tier | When | What it runs | Time |
| ----------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ----- |
| `npm run watch` | manual | `watch:test` — re-runs tests on file save | ~0.1s |
| Pre-commit (auto) | on stage | tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (staged files only) | ~1.3s |
| Pre-push (auto) | on push | `npm test` (full tsc + unit tests) | ~3.5s |
| `npm run check` | manual | Full project audit: all `check:*` scripts + knip + outdated | ~10s |
| `npm run fix` | manual | Auto-resolve fixable issues (lint, format) | ~3s |
| CI build (auto) | on push/PR | `npm run check` + `npm run test:ci` | ~30s+ |
| CI publish (auto) | on tag | `publish:publint` + `publish:attw`, then `npm publish` | ~10s |
| Tier | When | What it runs | Time |
| -------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- |
| `npm run watch` | manual | `watch:test` — re-runs tests on file save | ~0.1s |
| Pre-commit (auto) | on stage | tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (staged files only) | ~1.3s |
| Pre-push (auto) | on push | `npm test` (full tsc + unit tests) | ~3.5s |
| `npm run check` | manual | Correctness gates: tsc + oxlint + oxfmt + cspell (whole project) | ~3s |
| `npm run fix` | manual | Auto-resolve fixable issues (lint, format) | ~3s |
| `npm run maintain` | manual / CI (advisory) | `maintain:knip` + `maintain:outdated` (whole-project + network scans) | ~10s |
| CI build (auto) | on push/PR | `npm run check` + `npm run test:ci` | ~30s+ |
| CI maintain (auto, non-blocking) | on push/PR | `npm run maintain` — reports, never fails the build | ~10s |
| CI publish (auto) | on tag | `publish:publint` + `publish:attw`, then `npm publish` | ~10s |
### Why these splits?
- **`watch:*` is a manual tier, not a hook.** The developer starts it on demand (it has to be killed with Ctrl-C) and it runs in a dedicated terminal pane. It sits as the earliest tier in the feedback ladder, catching failures the moment a file is saved — before staging, before commit. The umbrella `watch` script is designed to aggregate multiple `watch:*` children (currently just `watch:test`); if more watchers are added later (e.g. `watch:oxlint`), the umbrella would switch to running them concurrently rather than sequentially.
- **`check:tsc`, `check:oxlint`, `check:oxfmt`, `check:cspell`** are in pre-commit because they are fast (~0.2–0.5s each), fully offline, and naturally scope to staged files via the `LEFTHOOK_FILES` env var convention. They give instant feedback on what you typed.
- **`test` (and the `tsc` it includes) is in pre-push** because it runs the whole test suite across the whole project. The pre-commit `LEFTHOOK_FILES` convention doesn't apply to the test runner, so pre-commit isn't the right home. Pre-push runs after all commits are made but before the push leaves the machine, catching regressions that span multiple commits.
- **`check:knip` and `check:outdated` are NOT in pre-commit** — knip scans the whole project (~4s, would noticeably slow the hook), and `check-outdated` queries the npm registry (~6.5s, network-dependent, advisory not correctness). Both run in `npm run check` and CI; pre-commit stays fast and offline.
- **`maintain:knip` and `maintain:outdated` are advisory, not correctness** — knip scans the whole project (~4s) and `check-outdated` queries the npm registry (~6.5s, network-dependent, and it exits non-zero whenever any dep is behind). That's why they live under `maintain:`, are excluded from pre-commit and from `check`, and run in CI as a **non-blocking** job: a stale dependency must never block an unrelated feature PR.
- **`publish:publint` and `publish:attw` are NOT in `check`** — they belong to the `publish:` prefix because they validate the _publishable artifact_ (`dist/`) and require a fresh build. Running them on every commit would be wasteful. They run in the CI `publish` job immediately before `npm publish`.
### Before pushing
Run `npm run check` locally. If you only trust pre-commit + CI, know that anything `check:knip` or `check:outdated` would catch will be caught by CI on the PR before merge.
Run `npm run check && npm run test` locally — both are the fast, offline correctness gates, safe to run any time. Anything `maintain:knip` or `maintain:outdated` would catch is reported by the non-blocking CI `maintain` job; run `npm run maintain` yourself only on a maintenance / update-deps branch.
## Publishing workflow