👷 Gate CI at 100% coverage

test:ci now runs c8 with --all --include "src/**/*.ts" --100, so the
build job fails when any runtime file under src/ is untested. --all is
what makes the gate non-vacuous: without it c8 counts only the files the
suite happened to load, and a new untested module stays invisible.

Add src/index.test.ts to load the public barrel, which was previously
never imported at runtime and so read as 0% under --all. matcher-shared.ts
is types-only (an empty runtime image) and carries a file-level c8 ignore
with the reason.

Why 100% and the rejected alternatives: development/ci.md § Coverage
threshold.

development/ci.md

@@ -97,6 +97,39 @@ Leave `act_runner`'s `force_pull` disabled.
   (`docker rmi gitea.e1nsnull.de/tmu/act-ci:<version>`); do not reach for
   force-pull.
 
+## Coverage threshold
+
+#### Decision (2026-09)
+
+`npm run test:ci` fails below 100% statements / branches / functions / lines
+across `src/**/*.ts` (`c8 --all --include "src/**/*.ts" --100`). The gate rides
+the `build` job; `npm run verify` stays coverage-free.
+
+#### Why
+
+- The types are the feature, so an untested branch is a hole in the contract,
+  not a metric to trade off; 100% is the only threshold that means "no hole".
+- `--all` counts a `src/` file no test imports. Without it c8 reports only the
+  files the suite happened to load, so a new untested module is invisible and
+  the threshold passes vacuously.
+- The gate rides `test:ci`, which `build` already runs — no new job or step.
+- `verify` stays fast and local; the slower coverage run is a CI-only tier (see
+  [workflow.md § Feedback tiers](./workflow.md#feedback-tiers)).
+
+#### Rejected
+
+- Per-file thresholds: a global 100% already forces every counted file to 100%.
+- A `check:coverage` script: it would re-run the suite or read c8's temp dir,
+  and no `check:*` script runs tests.
+- `--all` without `--include`: it would also sweep `scripts/`, which is not the
+  shipped surface.
+
+#### Known issue
+
+- `src/matcher-shared.ts` is types only, so its runtime image is empty; c8 still
+  lists it under `--all`. It carries a file-level `/* c8 ignore start */` with
+  the reason. Adding runtime code there means removing that directive.
+
 ## Coverage serving
 
 #### Decision (2026-09)