♻️ Run doc-test generation as an explicit CI step

Drop the `pretest:ci` lifecycle hook and call `create:doc-tests` from the
`build` job before `test:ci`. The hook hid the step from the job log and
made `test:ci` behave differently under npm than when run directly.
This commit is contained in:
tmu committed 2026-09-24 13:08:45 +00:00
1 parent 4dc58395c0
commit 400fe902e0
6 files changed
+13 -6

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ first-action facts. Do not restate evolving prose here — it will drift.
- **While iterating:** `npm run test` (`check:tsc` + the unit suite) for fast feedback on the files you changed.
- **Optional code intelligence:** this repo installs `@spences10/pi-lsp` (pinned in `.pi/settings.json`) as a project-local pi extension. It talks to the repo's own TypeScript 7 via `tsc --lsp --stdio` and exposes **read-only** tools — `lsp_hover`, `lsp_definition`, `lsp_references`, `lsp_find_symbol`, `lsp_document_symbols`, `lsp_diagnostics(_many)`. **When you are looking for a symbol, reach for the LSP before `rg`/`grep`** — `lsp_references` / `lsp_find_symbol` / `lsp_definition` / `lsp_document_symbols` are semantic and cross-file, so they see shadowing, imports and overloads that a text search cannot; use `lsp_hover` to read inferred types on generic-heavy code. Use `rg` for what the LSP cannot see — doc prose, string literals, config, task lists, file discovery — and reconcile the two sets before editing (symbols from the LSP, strings and prose from `rg`). It has no rename / code-action / apply-edit surface — the write side is pi's `edit` tool + `check:tsc`. Treat empty LSP output as _inconclusive_, not success: **`npm run test` / `npm run verify` remain the sole authoritative gate** (see the next bullet). The server keeps running across that gate with a ~5 min idle timeout and registers no file watchers, so if you change `tsconfig.json` / `package.json` mid-session its diagnostics can be stale — when LSP output disagrees with `check:tsc`, trust `check:tsc` and restart pi (or wait out the idle timeout) before concluding the LSP is wrong.
- **Definition of done — run this before you call the work finished:** `npm run verify`. If all green, commit. If red, look at the output, fix the root cause, and re-run.
- **Touched a `ts`-tagged fence in `README.md` / `CONTRIBUTING.md`?** Run `npm run create:doc-tests` first: it regenerates the gitignored tests under `src/doc-test/__generated__/`, formats and type-checks them, so `verify` executes the documented example. CI does this automatically via `pretest:ci`; the fast local tiers do not. See [development/docs.md](./development/docs.md).
- **Touched a `ts`-tagged fence in `README.md` / `CONTRIBUTING.md`?** Run `npm run create:doc-tests` first: it regenerates the gitignored tests under `src/doc-test/__generated__/`, formats and type-checks them, so `verify` executes the documented example. CI runs it in an explicit step before `test:ci`; the fast local tiers do not. See [development/docs.md](./development/docs.md).
- **On commit:** write a good message (see [CONTRIBUTING.md § Commit messages](./CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages)). Lefthook's pre-commit hook already runs the fast, offline, staged-file checks — don't run them by hand. If the hook fails on style, `npm run fix`, restage, recommit.
- **Document decisions where the next maintainer will look:** rationale, rejected alternatives and known issues go in `development/<category>.md` (see [development/README.md](./development/README.md)); the actionable rule stays in [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) and links to it. Write each fact once — never copy the rule into `development/` or the reason into `CONTRIBUTING.md` — and change both in the same commit when a rule changes.
- **`npm run maintain` is NOT part of the feature loop.** Its scans are advisory, never a gate; run them only on an explicit maintenance / update-deps branch.